Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is a bit better than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), with a global score of 79.5 against 75.7. The Galaxy S7 features a much powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has less RAM, it also counts with 3 more cores. Galaxy S7 counts with a way better screen than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) also has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and better 60 frames per second video frame rates. Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) counts with a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S7 has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.