Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 1.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored)'s global score of 75.7. The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a much better performing CPU than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more processing cores.
Galaxy S8 has a better screen than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a better screen density. The Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) captures a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Galaxy S8 counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy S8 has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.