Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a general score of 87.9, which is better than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored)'s 75.7 overall score. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), but it's noticeably heavier. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version while Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15 version.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a little inferior number of pixels per screen inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a quite bigger display. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a very superior processing power than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) one, both have equal internal storage. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored). Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because it has a much better video resolution and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.