Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 15 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.09 x 2.88 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 431 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Immortalis-G715s MC10 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 1.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), with a score of 81.1 against 75.7. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and Google Pixel 9a (Rumored) has Android 15. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), but it is notably heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a bit inferior pixels count in each inch in the display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a quite bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a way better performance than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a superior camera than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored), because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 9a (Rumored).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.