Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.9 | 65.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Wear OS | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-23 |
| 1.61 x 1.61 x 0.48 inches | 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 1.09 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Matte Black, Matte Hazel and Polished Silver | Charcoal, Dusk and Fjord |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 408 x 408 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 481 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm SW5100 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1700 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 702 GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 0 | 7.81 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 306mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2.4 is slightly better than the Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm), with a 65.6 score against 59.9. The Nokia 2.4 comes with Android 11 OS, while Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm) works with Wear OS OS. Nokia 2.4 is a thinner but incredibly heavier device than the Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm). The Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm) has an incredibly better screen than Nokia 2.4, because although it has a really smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 408 x 408, it also counts with a lot greater pixel count per inch in the display.
The Nokia 2.4 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm), and although they both have 2 GB of RAM, the Nokia 2.4 also has a higher number of cores. Nokia 2.4 takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm). The Nokia 2.4 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Nokia 2.4 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Nokia 2.4 counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 306mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Nokia 2.4 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.