Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.9 | 65.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Wear OS | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2015-01-04 |
| 1.61 x 1.61 x 0.48 inches | 5.27 x 2.64 x 0.36 inches |
| 1.09 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Matte Black, Matte Hazel and Polished Silver | Black, Green, Pink, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 349.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 408 x 408 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 481 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm SW5100 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1700 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 702 GPU | Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 5.06 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 0 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.8 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 306mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.28 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi 2 is a bit better than Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm), getting a 65.7 score against 59.9. Xiaomi Redmi 2's body is much heavier but noticeably thinner than Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm). Xiaomi Redmi 2 works with Android 4.4.4 operating system, while Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm) counts with Wear OS operating system.
The Xiaomi Redmi 2 features a little faster processor than Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm), because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 4 cores, the Xiaomi Redmi 2 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor. The Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm) counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 2, because although it has a really smaller display and a way worse resolution of 408 x 408 pixels, it also counts with a lot greater count of pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Redmi 2 features a lot better camera than Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm). The Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm) features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 2, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 32 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi 2 has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel Watch 3 (41mm), because it has 2200mAh of battery capacity instead of 306mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi 2 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.