Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.1 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Wear OS | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-06 |
| -- | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 1.31 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Matte Black, Matte Hazel and Polished Silver | Titan gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 456 x 456 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 461 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm SW5100 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1700 MHz processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 702 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 0 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 4.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 420mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG K92 is much better than Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm), with an 85.4 score against 59.1. The LG K92 works with Android 10 operating system, while Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) counts with Wear OS operating system. LG K92 has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm), because it has 4 more cpu cores and more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm) has a much sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a way worse resolution of 456 x 456 and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per display inch. The LG K92 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm), because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG K92 captures greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm). LG K92 has a way better battery performance than Google Pixel Watch 3 (45mm), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 420mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the LG K92 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.