Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max has an overall score of 85.3, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel's overall score of 80.2. Even though iPhone 11 Pro Max is a lot heavier than Google Pixel, it's just a little bit thinner and newer. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a quite greater pixel number in each inch in the display, a bigger display and a higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a better performing CPU than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a 64 bits processing unit and more processing cores. The iPhone 11 Pro Max takes slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition, a smaller back camera sensor and a lesser mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The Google Pixel has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a way better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 3969mAh battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.