Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is much better than the Google Pixel's score of 80.2. Even though iPhone 13 Pro Max is extremely heavier than the Google Pixel, it's somewhat thinner and also incredibly newer. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel, because it has a much larger display, a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Google Pixel one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a really superior performance than Google Pixel, because it has 2 GB more RAM, 2 more CPU cores and a 64-bit processing unit.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a way better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 57 percent more battery size. IPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.