Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2016-09-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 7 is a bit better than Google Pixel, having an 81.6 score against 80.2. IPhone 7 is a just a little bit lighter and thinner phone than the Google Pixel, even when they were released only 1 months apart. The Google Pixel has a little more vivid screen than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a little bigger screen, a way higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen.
IPhone 7 features just a little better processing power than Google Pixel, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 4 cpu cores. The iPhone 7 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel counts with a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone 7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel also counts with a back-facing camera with more mega pixels and a way larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Google Pixel has a much better battery life than Apple iPhone 7, because it has 2770mAh of battery capacity against 1960mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 7 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.