Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel's global score of 80.2. The Google Pixel 4 is a way newer and just a bit thinner phone than the Google Pixel, although it's somewhat heavier. Google Pixel 4 features a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2280, a just a bit higher display pixels density and a little larger screen. The Google Pixel has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 4 and Google Pixel have very similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 4 has a less mega-pixels resolution back camera, a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture. The Google Pixel 4 has just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a bit more money than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.