Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than the Google Pixel, with a score of 82.9 against 80.2. Google Pixel 4 XL is a way newer and a little bit thinner phone than Google Pixel, although it is also incredibly heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a just a little higher pixels amount in each inch in the display, a bigger display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040px. Google Pixel 4 XL and Google Pixel feature very similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a back-facing camera with a lower 12.2 MP resolution and a smaller sensor capturing worse quality pictures, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations.
Google Pixel has a superior memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 34 percent more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.