Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-10-20 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is slightly better than LG G7 Fit's general score of 77. The Google Pixel is a incredibly older and just a little bit thicker device than the LG G7 Fit, but Google made it just a little bit lighter anyway. The LG G7 Fit counts with a sharper display than Google Pixel, because it has a greater pixels density, a way better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and a bigger display.
The LG G7 Fit has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG G7 Fit's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Google Pixel, they have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
LG G7 Fit has a camera that's just as good as the camera in Google Pixel, because although the LG G7 Fit has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos and a way smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, it also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back.
LG G7 Fit features a little better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.