Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is slightly better than the Google Pixel, having an 82.7 score against 80.2. LG G8X ThinQ's design is way newer and just a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel's, but it's also much heavier. LG G8X ThinQ features a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG G8X ThinQ features a display that is very similar to the Google Pixel one, because although the LG G8X ThinQ has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ takes a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, a lower (4K) video resolution and a lower 12 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG G8X ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.