Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.72 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is just a bit better than LG V10, having a global score of 80.2 against 78.6. The Google Pixel construction has the same thickness than the LG V10, but it is a lot lighter. The Google Pixel features a bit faster CPU than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel also has a greater number of cores.
The LG V10 counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel, because it has a quite larger display, a bit higher pixel number per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The LG V10 features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images in low-light environments, better 120 frames per second video frame rates and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
The LG V10 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V10 features a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
The Google Pixel is a little more expensive than the LG V10, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.