Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-10-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel's score of 80.2. LG V30S ThinQ is a newer and thinner device than the Google Pixel, but it is also just a bit heavier. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a way better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, a larger display and a little bit greater pixel density.
LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V30S ThinQ features a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V30S ThinQ features better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity. LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a lot tinier sensor capturing much lower quality images, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a way better resolution back camera and a larger aperture to take better photos in low light environments.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.