Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Google Pixel, with an 81.3 score against 80.2. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is a little heavier than the Google Pixel, it's thinner and newer. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has 4 more cores and more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel, because it has a larger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a little bit higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a much tinier back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light images and a back facing camera with a way better 16 megapixels resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 3300mAh battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.