Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is better than Google Pixel, having a global score of 91.2 against 80.2. LG Wing is a way newer phone than the Google Pixel, but it is notably thicker and notably heavier. The Google Pixel has just a bit better display than LG Wing, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a little better pixel density.
LG Wing features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Wing features a little bit better performance than Google Pixel, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cores.
The LG Wing shoots way better photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Wing also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back camera with way more megapixels, a larger camera aperture and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures.
LG Wing has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.