Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is better than Google Pixel, getting an 89.6 score against 80.2. Motorola edge's construction is a lot newer than the Google Pixel's, although it is a little bit thicker and heavier. Motorola edge counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more processing cores.
The Google Pixel features a bit better looking screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a really smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels quantity per inch in the display. Motorola edge features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola edge shoots way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola edge also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures, a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola edge has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola edge costs a lot more than the Google Pixel, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.