Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a bit better than the Google Pixel, getting a overall score of 83.4 against 80.2. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro design has the same thickness than Google Pixel, but it is a lot heavier. Google Pixel features a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and less cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a really bigger display. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a lot better camera than Google Pixel, because it has a much better video resolution, a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light captures and a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.