Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than the Google Pixel, with an 87.1 score against 80.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly heavier phone than Google Pixel, but both are equally thin. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a better screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser CPU cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs, better 60 fps video frame rates and a back facing camera with a much better 50 MP resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 62 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.