Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a global score of 80.2, which is a bit better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 global score. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel is notably older than Moto G Power, it's body is thinner and incredibly lighter. The Google Pixel has a slightly better screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto G Power also has more processing cores.
Motorola Moto G Power features a bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a much more MP camera and a larger aperture.
The Motorola Moto G Power features a much better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G Power, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.