Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-10-20 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a overall score of 80.2 against 75.8. Although Google Pixel and the Moto Z Force were only released with a couple months difference, Google Pixel's body is thicker but also lighter than the Moto Z Force. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel, because it has a quite greater pixels number per inch of display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a bit larger display.
The Moto Z Force counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel. Both of them have 4 processing cores and the same RAM amount. The Moto Z Force features a bit better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also has a larger aperture and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Moto Z Force features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force has better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 3500mAh battery size against 2770mAh.
The Google Pixel costs more than Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.