Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action's general score of 78.5. The Google Pixel is an extremely older phone than Motorola One Action, but Google was able to make it just a little thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Motorola One Action counts with just a bit better performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola One Action also has a higher number of faster cores.
Motorola One Action has a display that's just as good as the display in Google Pixel, because although the Motorola One Action has a little worse pixels amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a larger display. Motorola One Action features a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Action also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Action features improved battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh. Google Pixel has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel also counts with a back facing camera with a higher resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.