Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting a score of 80.2 against 79.8. Google Pixel is an older cellphone than the Motorola One Hyper, but it is extremely lighter and a little thinner anyway. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a higher number of cores.
The Google Pixel has a bit better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a really smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels per inch of display. Motorola One Hyper has a much greater memory for apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also has a larger aperture for better low light captures and videos and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel is also a bit cheaper, which makes it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.