Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Vision is slightly better than Google Pixel, with an 80.7 score against 80.2. Motorola One Vision's body has the same thickness than the Google Pixel, but it's a lot heavier. The Motorola One Vision counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Vision also has a greater number of cores.
Motorola One Vision counts with a screen that is very similar to Google Pixel's display, because although the Motorola One Vision has a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2520px resolution. The Motorola One Vision captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Motorola One Vision has a very superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Motorola One Vision also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola One Vision features better battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.