Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is just a bit better than Motorola One Zoom, with a score of 80.2 against 80. Google Pixel's construction is just a little bit thinner and extremely lighter than Motorola One Zoom, although it was released 3 years before. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola One Zoom also has a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 128 GB.
Motorola One Zoom features a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also has a larger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.