Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a little bit better than Google Pixel, having an 80.3 score against 80.2. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW construction is a lot newer, but a bit thicker and a lot heavier than the Google Pixel. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel features just a bit better looking display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density. Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a much more mega pixels back facing camera, faster video frame rate, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much larger camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.