Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is just a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView, with an 80.2 score against 76.4. Google Pixel is an a lot older and just a little thicker cellphone than Nokia 9 PureView, but Google was able to build it lighter anyway. The Nokia 9 PureView features a bit better looking display than Google Pixel, because it has a just a little more pixels per screen inch, a larger screen and a way better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
The Nokia 9 PureView's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as Google Pixel's one, both of them have the same internal storage. The Nokia 9 PureView has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. The Nokia 9 PureView features superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 3320mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
The Google Pixel takes a little bit better photos and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photos or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel also counts with a more mega-pixels camera and a bigger back camera sensor shooting higher quality photos.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel is also by far the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.