Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a general score of 80.8, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel's global score of 80.2. Nokia XR20 is a much newer device than the Google Pixel, but it's extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Nokia XR20 has a little faster processor than Google Pixel, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nokia XR20 features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a lot larger display. Nokia XR20 takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video quality and a 0.43 inches back camera sensor, the Nokia XR20 also has faster 60 fps video frame rates, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Nokia XR20 has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Nokia XR20 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 counts with a way better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Nokia XR20, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.