Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is just a bit better than Galaxy A25 5G, getting an 80.2 score against 79.9. The Google Pixel body is much lighter than the Galaxy A25 5G, although it is just a bit thicker and was released 7 years before. Google Pixel counts with a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has less cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a little inferior pixel count per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2770mAh. The Galaxy A25 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a way higher 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.