Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A30s, getting an 80.2 score against 79.8. Even though the Google Pixel is noticeably older and thicker than Samsung Galaxy A30s, it's design is still lighter. Galaxy A30s and Google Pixel have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A30s has a higher number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM.
Google Pixel has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a much better screen pixels density. Google Pixel counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a back camera with much less mega pixels resolution and a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy A30s has much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A30s also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A30s features a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.