Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 general score. The Google Pixel construction is incredibly lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it's a little bit thicker and was released 8 years before. The Google Pixel counts with a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower number of cores and 2 GB less RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a slightly better screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a quite inferior count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way larger screen. The Galaxy A35 5G's memory to store more games and applications is just as good as Google Pixel's one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A35 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos, a lot higher resolution back camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A35 5G counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has an 81% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.