Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has an overall score of 90.7, which is much better than the Google Pixel's 80.2 general score. Galaxy A52's construction is newer and a little thinner than the Google Pixel's, although it's extremely heavier. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
Google Pixel has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A52 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos, a larger aperture for better low light images and video and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 62% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.