Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is better than Google Pixel, with a 91.3 score against 80.2. The Galaxy A52 5G construction is way newer and just a bit thinner, but also a lot heavier than Google Pixel. Google Pixel counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a bit better screen density.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a lot better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor, a camera in the back with a lot better 64 MP resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 62 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.