Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has an overall score of 80.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. Google Pixel's design is extremely lighter than the Galaxy A70, but it is a little thicker and was released 3 years before. The Galaxy A70 has just a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Google Pixel also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos.
The Google Pixel costs exactly the same than the Galaxy A70.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.