Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is better than Google Pixel's global score of 80.2. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is way newer and just a little thinner than Google Pixel's, but it is much heavier. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel has a slightly better display than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 62 percent bigger battery capacity. Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a way bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a larger aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than the Google Pixel, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.