Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is way better than the Google Pixel's 80.2 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a extremely newer and much thinner cellphone than Google Pixel, although it is also way heavier. Galaxy Fold features just a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
Google Pixel counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Fold shoots a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a lesser MP resolution camera and a tinier camera sensor offering a lower image quality, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.