Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, having a overall score of 80.2 against 78.9. The Google Pixel body is much lighter and just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it was released many years before. The Google Pixel features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy M20 has a processor that's very similar to the processor in Google Pixel, and although the Samsung Galaxy M20 has a higher number of cores , they both have the same RAM memory amount. Google Pixel has just a bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a back-facing camera with less megapixels resolution and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has an 81% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.