Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is a bit better than Google Pixel's 80.2 global score. Samsung Galaxy M51's construction is incredibly newer, but just a bit thicker and much heavier than Google Pixel. The Galaxy M51 has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Google Pixel features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a lot better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a back camera with a way higher resolution, a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a very superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 153% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.