Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the Google Pixel's score of 80.2. The Galaxy Note 20 is a incredibly newer and a bit thinner phone than the Google Pixel, although it's a lot heavier. The Google Pixel has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features as much memory capacity to install applications and games as the Google Pixel one, both of them have the same 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 55% bigger battery size. The Galaxy Note 20 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel, because although it has a lesser megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.