Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Google Pixel, getting a 98.9 score against 80.2. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is way newer and just a bit thinner than Google Pixel's, but it is also heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a lot larger display and a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a quite better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel, because it has a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way better resolution camera and a way bigger sensor.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.