Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is better than Google Pixel's overall score of 80.2. Galaxy Note10's construction is incredibly newer and just a little thinner, but somewhat heavier than Google Pixel. Google Pixel features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel, because it has a greater number of cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, a smaller sensor taking lower quality pictures and videos and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a way bigger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy Note10 has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Note10 counts with longer battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.