Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a little bit better than Google Pixel, having an 86.2 score against 80.2. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's body has the same thickness than the Google Pixel, but it's incredibly heavier. Google Pixel features a little sharper display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a worse video definition, a tinier sensor giving a lower image quality and a lesser megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.