Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2014-09-29 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.72 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note4, getting a overall score of 80.2 against 77.6. Google Pixel's design is a lot newer and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note4's, although it is also a bit thicker. The Galaxy Note4 counts with a little bit better display than Google Pixel, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a quite larger display.
Google Pixel counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has 3220mAh of battery capacity instead of 2770mAh. The Galaxy Note4 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a tinier sensor and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy Note4 also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.