Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-10-20 | 2016-08-02 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's overall score of 79.5. Even though Google Pixel and Samsung Galaxy Note7 were released with only 3 months difference, Google Pixel's design is somewhat lighter but also a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy Note7.
The Galaxy Note7's processing unit is just as good as the Google Pixel one, they have a Quad-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory. Galaxy Note7 features just a bit better display than Google Pixel, because it has a just a little better count of pixels per inch in the display, a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a quite larger screen.
Galaxy Note7 features a little bit better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 256 GB. Google Pixel counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel also counts with a more megapixels camera and a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has greater battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.