Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-20 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is much better than the Google Pixel's 80.2 general score. The Galaxy S10 5G design is extremely newer and just a bit thinner than the Google Pixel's, but it's also a lot heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel, because it has a quite better display density, a lot higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a way larger display. Galaxy S10 5G takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor providing a lower image quality, a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much bigger aperture.
Galaxy S10 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 62 percent greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs a little more money than the Google Pixel, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.