Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-10-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Google Pixel, with a 95.4 score against 80.2. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a notably newer cellphone than Google Pixel, but it is way heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a really bigger screen, a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel, because it has a much better video definition, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and a back-facing camera with a much better 108 MP resolution.
Google Pixel and Galaxy S22 Ultra count with incredibly similar storage capacity to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has an 81 percent larger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.