Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | -- |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel's 80.2 global score. The Galaxy S25 is a extremely lighter and extremely thinner cellphone than Google Pixel. The Galaxy S25 counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2340px resolution and a larger display.
Google Pixel counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S25's storage for applications and games is just as good as Google Pixel's one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has a larger camera aperture, a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, a much higher video definition and a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. Galaxy S25 counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.