Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-20 | -- |
| 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 5.04 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.72 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than Google Pixel, having a 90.7 score against 80.2. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much thinner and lighter phone than the Google Pixel. Google Pixel has a very superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster).
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Google Pixel, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little bit better screen density and a much larger display. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel, because it has a way better 200 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a way bigger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality, a larger aperture and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has an 81% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.